Let me start this by saying - you're not smarter than Google.
The company processes over 8.5 billion searches per day, has access to more data than most of us can fathom, and generally speaking has some of the most competent engineering in the world building out new features and algorithmic changes.
However, despite the fact that most people would readily agree with the above, I see time and time again marketing agencies advocating against the use of automated strategies - particularly when it comes to bidding. Reasons I've heard from vary ranging from we get better performance from manual bidding to we don't trust Google and everything in between.
In this blog, I want to discuss some thoughts on this and why I think automated bidding gives marketers a serious advantage when used correctly.
Manual bidding was once a standard practice in Google Ads. It involves manually setting bids for specific keywords or ad groups. While it does provide a more granular level of control, it has and continues to become an increasingly less efficient and less effective approach due to:
In contrast, automated bidding strategies leverage Google's machine learning and advanced algorithms to analyze massive datasets make instantaneous bid optimizations based on various factors, including user behavior, search intent, and historical performance data - all of this with zero manual input required.
By analyzing vast amounts of data, including historical campaign performance, user behavior, and contextual signals, automated bidding strategies offer a pretty powerful way for you to optimize bids in real time - with relatively minimal effort I might add.
This can help you get the best possible results whether your goal is maximizing clicks, conversions, or return on ad spend (ROAS).
Other key advantages of automated bidding include:
Based on my experience, there are a couple reasons why people fight for using manual bidding versus automate bidding strategies including:
However, these concerns are mostly unfounded. While Google may try to drive up spend at times or there may be some extremely rare situations where manual bidding provides an incremental improvement, their main goal is to get you better results!
Better results, mean you spend more money with them and the fact is that automated bidding consistently outperforms manual - in addition to providing a range of other efficiency-related benefits.
Ok so if we aren't using manual bidding then what are marketers supposed to do?
The key to unlocking the full potential of automated bidding lies in training Google's algorithm to understand your business objectives and target audience. This involves providing clear signals through conversion tracking, audience targeting, and ad creative optimization. In other words, your job is to train Google's algorithm and machine learning.
The better, more relevant data you fee the algorithm the more quickly it optimized which means better performance.
Interested in more? Here are some additional tips to boost your Google Ads campaigns.
At the moment, I don't and wouldn't recommend the use of Google Ads AI ad generator. It hasn't really gotten to the level that a good copywriter/creative could produce. In my opinion, it tends to just push out overgeneralized keywords that I feel fall flat as compelling ads.
The difference between using AI in copy creation versus bidding is there is an emotional element to creating compelling ads/copy that I feel AI struggles to create. When it comes to bidding, things are much less nuanced and emotion based. This makes it far easier for an algorithm to find you the best possible bidding opportunities for whatever your goals are.
It's undeniable that Google processes far more data than most people can comprehend. While manual bidding might offer a sense of control, automated strategies that leverage Google's AI provide a significant advantage in terms of efficiency, accuracy, and overall performance.
In the end, the choice between manual and automated bidding comes down to this: Do you want to spend your time and resources on repetitive tasks that an algorithm can do better, or instead focus on strategic and higher level initiatives that will truly help drive business growth?